DARP vs. FMTM

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DARP returned 50.74% vs 42.90% for FMTM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DARP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.

Performance

DARP vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than FMTM's 18.34% return.

DARP

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -6.34%
• 6M: 15.09%
• YTD: 22.65%
• 1Y: 50.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 32.89%

FMTM

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -10.52%
• 6M: 8.31%
• YTD: 18.34%
• 1Y: 42.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DARP vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	22.65%	49.16%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	18.34%	28.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and FMTM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.74

The correlation between DARP and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DARP vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 81
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 71
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DARP	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.65	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.16	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.28	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	3.35	+0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.01	11.46	+2.55

DARP vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DARP vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DARP	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.27%	-12.86%	-17.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.82%	-12.86%	+1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.25%	-12.86%	+4.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-2.16%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	3.75%	-0.12%

Volatility

DARP vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) is 9.95%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that DARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DARP	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.95%	11.12%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.22%	20.71%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.82%	26.12%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.59%	24.62%	+1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.59%	24.62%	+1.97%

DARP vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DARP vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than FMTM's 0.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.35%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DARP and FMTM in my portfolio?

DARP and FMTM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DARP or FMTM?

FMTM has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to DARP (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs FMTM's -12.86%.

Which ETF is better, DARP or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 50.74% vs 42.90% for FMTM. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DARP has been the lower-risk option at 9.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DARP or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 50.74% return vs 42.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DARP or FMTM?

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DARP or FMTM?

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.25% for FMTM.

What is the main difference between DARP and FMTM?

DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.45% for FMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.