DAPR vs. PSCW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DAPR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April) and PSCW (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DAPR is passively managed, while PSCW is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DAPR returned 6.20%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for PSCW. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PSCW.

Performance

DAPR vs. PSCW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPR achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than PSCW's 7.49% return.

DAPR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 4.04%
• 6M: 4.78%
• 1Y: 10.07%
• 3Y*: 10.83%
• 5Y*: 6.20%
• 10Y*: —

PSCW

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: 14.98%
• 3Y*: 11.73%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAPR vs. PSCW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April	4.04%	5.74%	14.99%	9.84%	-6.84%	5.34%
PSCW Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF	7.49%	6.56%	12.95%	11.44%	-5.52%	4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPR and PSCW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2021	0.87

The correlation between DAPR and PSCW shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DAPR vs. PSCW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DAPR	PSCW
Technology	36.2%	34.7%
Financial Services	11.9%	13.6%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.7%
Healthcare	8.4%	9.1%
Industrials	8.1%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.2%
Energy	3.5%	3.0%
Utilities	2.3%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.7%

Return for Risk

DAPR vs. PSCW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPR

DAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
DAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
DAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

PSCW

PSCW Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PSCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PSCW Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PSCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PSCW Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPR vs. PSCW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DAPR	PSCW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.66	3.84	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.98	6.45	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.90	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.99	10.05	+1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	59.41	51.44	+7.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DAPR vs. PSCW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is comparable to the PSCW Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPR and PSCW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAPR	PSCW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66	3.84	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.95	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.98	-0.21

Drawdowns

DAPR vs. PSCW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPR drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum PSCW drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPR and PSCW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAPR	PSCW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.51%	-11.89%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.84%	-1.50%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.51%	-11.89%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.51%	-11.89%	+1.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.07%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-2.18%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	0.29%	-0.12%

Volatility

DAPR vs. PSCW - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) at 0.56%. This indicates that DAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAPR	PSCW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	0.56%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.88%	2.48%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78%	3.92%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.21%	7.64%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.16%	7.59%	+0.57%

DAPR vs. PSCW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCW's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAPR vs. PSCW - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAPR nor PSCW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAPR and PSCW in my portfolio?

DAPR and PSCW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAPR or PSCW?

DAPR has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to PSCW (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAPR dropped -10.51% vs PSCW's -11.89%.

Which ETF is better, DAPR or PSCW?

On 5-year performance, PSCW leads with 7.19% vs 6.20% for DAPR. On fees, PSCW is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSCW has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAPR or PSCW?

Over the 5-year period, PSCW has performed better with a 7.19% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAPR or PSCW?

PSCW is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAPR or PSCW?

DAPR and PSCW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DAPR and PSCW?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DAPR and 0.61% for PSCW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 3.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.