DAPR vs. FDND

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DAPR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April) and FDND (FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while FDND is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by FT Vest. DAPR is passively managed, while FDND is actively managed. Over the past year, DAPR returned 8.55% vs 1.61% for FDND. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FDND.

Performance

DAPR vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPR achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's 0.56% return.

DAPR

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: 4.01%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 1Y: 8.55%
• 3Y*: 9.77%
• 5Y*: 5.99%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.09%

FDND

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: 2.80%
• 6M: 3.79%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 1Y: 1.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April	$260.71K	$269.51K	$613.05K
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	$52.86K	$42.66K	$64.39K

DAPR vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April	4.42%	5.74%	12.14%
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	0.56%	9.69%	15.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPR and FDND is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.63

The correlation between DAPR and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DAPR vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DAPR

DAPR Risk / Return Rank: 94
DAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
DAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FDND

FDND Risk / Return Rank: 9
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DAPR vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAPR	FDND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	-0.08	+2.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	0.02	+3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.00	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.18	-0.08	+5.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.81	-0.18	+26.99

DAPR vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPR and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAPR vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPR drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPR and FDND.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAPR	FDND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.51%	-24.12%	+13.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.59%	-20.49%	+18.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-5.97%	+5.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-5.84%	+3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	9.05%	-8.74%

Volatility

DAPR vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) is 1.58%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that DAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAPR	FDND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	5.55%	-3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	15.62%	-12.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	19.58%	-16.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.24%	21.40%	-13.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.10%	21.40%	-13.30%

DAPR vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAPR vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

DAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	8.09%	8.11%	5.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAPR and FDND in my portfolio?

DAPR and FDND have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAPR or FDND?

FDND has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to DAPR (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAPR dropped -10.51% vs FDND's -24.12%.

Which ETF is better, DAPR or FDND?

On 1-year performance, DAPR leads with 8.55% vs 1.61% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAPR or FDND?

Over the 1-year period, DAPR has performed better with a 8.55% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAPR or FDND?

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAPR or FDND?

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 8.09%, compared with 0.00% for DAPR.

What is the main difference between DAPR and FDND?

DAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DAPR and 0.75% for FDND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.