PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAPR vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DAPR vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DAPR vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPR achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than DMAX's -0.37% return.


DAPR

1D
0.47%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.06%
6M
2.92%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
10Y*

DMAX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
1.76%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAPR vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DAPR vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPR
DAPR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPR vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAPRDMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.59

2.26

-1.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

3.38

-2.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.51

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

3.99

-3.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.28

19.40

-15.12

DAPR vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPR and DMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAPRDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.26

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.68

-0.97

Correlation

The correlation between DAPR and DMAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DAPR vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

DAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


Drawdowns

DAPR vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPR drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPR and DMAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DAPRDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-3.37%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-2.00%

-7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-0.42%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.41%

+1.30%

Volatility

DAPR vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) have volatilities of 0.95% and 0.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DAPRDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.98%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

1.81%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

3.46%

+8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

3.57%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.27%

3.57%

+4.70%