DAPR vs. DMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX).
DAPR and DMAX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DAPR is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Apr 16, 2021. DMAX is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Dec 31, 2024. Both DAPR and DMAX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DAPR vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAPR vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April | 1.06% | 5.78% |
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF | -0.37% | 7.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAPR achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than DMAX's -0.37% return.
DAPR
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 7.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAPR vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAPR vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank
DAPR
DMAX
DAPR vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAPR | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 2.26 | -1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 3.38 | -2.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.51 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 3.99 | -3.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | 19.40 | -15.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAPR | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 2.26 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.68 | -0.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAPR and DMAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAPR vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison
DAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF | 1.18% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
DAPR vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAPR drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPR and DMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAPR | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -3.37% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -2.00% | -7.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.97% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -0.42% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.41% | +1.30% |
Volatility
DAPR vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) have volatilities of 0.95% and 0.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAPR | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 0.98% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.78% | 1.81% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 3.46% | +8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 3.57% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 3.57% | +4.70% |