DAPR vs. FFEB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB).

DAPR and FFEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DAPR is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Apr 16, 2021. FFEB is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 21, 2020.

Performance

DAPR vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DAPR vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April	1.06%	5.74%	14.99%	9.84%	-6.84%	5.34%
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	-1.36%	13.76%	16.64%	19.95%	-7.51%	8.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPR achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than FFEB's -1.36% return.

DAPR

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: 6.82%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFEB

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: -1.36%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 14.47%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAPR vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DAPR and FFEB have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

DAPR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April

FFEB

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February

Return for Risk

DAPR vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPR

DAPR Risk / Return Rank: 41
DAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
DAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
DAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FFEB

FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 73
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPR vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DAPR	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	1.17	-0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	1.76	-0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	1.72	-0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.28	9.15	-4.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DAPR vs. FFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FFEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPR and FFEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAPR	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	1.17	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.77	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between DAPR and FFEB is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DAPR vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAPR nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DAPR vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPR drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPR and FFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAPR	FFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.51%	-22.81%	+12.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-8.65%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.87%	+3.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-2.46%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	1.62%	+0.09%

Volatility

DAPR vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) is 0.95%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that DAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAPR	FFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.95%	3.72%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.78%	5.65%	-3.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.61%	12.39%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.27%	10.88%	-2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.27%	13.90%	-5.63%