DAPP vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
DAPP and GDXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DAPP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2021. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009. Both DAPP and GDXJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DAPP vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAPP vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | -9.74% | 15.03% | 44.87% | 285.02% | -85.60% | -38.65% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 5.50% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -10.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAPP achieves a -9.74% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 5.50% return.
DAPP
- 1D
- 6.88%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -9.74%
- 6M
- -31.40%
- 1Y
- 65.23%
- 3Y*
- 49.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ
- 1D
- 8.53%
- 1M
- -23.14%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- 1Y
- 114.70%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.70%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAPP vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAPP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAPP vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
DAPP
GDXJ
DAPP vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAPP | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 2.27 | -1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 2.50 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 3.52 | -2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.72 | 12.30 | -9.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAPP | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.27 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.07 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAPP and GDXJ is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DAPP vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.21% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
DAPP vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and GDXJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAPP | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.90% | -88.66% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.21% | -32.92% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.51% | -23.14% | -27.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.23% | -60.91% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.05% | 9.43% | +12.62% |
Volatility
DAPP vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) is 19.45%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that DAPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAPP | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.45% | 20.63% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.35% | 42.33% | +8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.96% | 50.75% | +16.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.29% | 40.56% | +32.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.29% | 44.45% | +28.84% |