DAPP vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAPP is a Blockchain fund tracking the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. DAPP is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DAPP charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

DAPP vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPP achieves a 32.37% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 102.64% return.

DAPP

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 32.37%
• 6M: 20.82%
• 1Y: 43.38%
• 3Y*: 51.74%
• 5Y*: 0.56%
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -6.69%
• 1M: 48.67%
• YTD: 102.64%
• 6M: 61.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAPP vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	32.37%	2.93%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	102.64%	-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPP and CIFU is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

DAPP vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPP

DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 21
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 17

CIFU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPP vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAPP	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.74	—	—

Drawdowns

DAPP vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -92.61%, which is greater than CIFU's maximum drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAPP	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.61%	-77.20%	-15.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.81%	-6.69%	-27.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.16%	-43.16%	-18.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DAPP	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.22%	207.67%	-145.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.11%	207.67%	-134.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.81%	207.67%	-134.86%

DAPP vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPP has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAPP vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAPP nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	0.00%	0.00%	10.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAPP and CIFU in my portfolio?

DAPP and CIFU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DAPP or CIFU?

On fees, DAPP is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAPP or CIFU?

DAPP is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAPP or CIFU?

DAPP and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DAPP and CIFU?

DAPP is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for DAPP and 1.50% for CIFU.