DAPP vs. ARMH
DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAPP is a Blockchain fund tracking the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, while ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. DAPP is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DAPP charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
DAPP vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DAPP
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 36.02%
- 5Y*
- -5.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.85%
ARMH
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -15.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $200.16K | $386.00K | $674.29K | |
| $5.29M | $5.87M | $14.12M |
DAPP vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | -19.96% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAPP and ARMH is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAPP vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
DAPP
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DAPP vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAPP | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAPP vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -92.61%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -48.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAPP | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.61% | -48.81% | -43.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.64% | -38.20% | -7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -24.08% | -36.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.89% | — | — |
Volatility
DAPP vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAPP | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.27% | 103.71% | -39.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.09% | 103.71% | -30.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.67% | 103.71% | -31.04% |
DAPP vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAPP has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAPP vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither DAPP nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAPP and ARMH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for DAPP.
DAPP and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DAPP is categorized as Blockchain, while ARMH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for DAPP and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for DAPP and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer