DAMD vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

DAMD (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. DAMD is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAMD charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

DAMD vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF (DAMD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAMD achieves a -90.01% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -42.45% return.

DAMD

• 1D: 21.08%
• 1M: -30.23%
• YTD: -90.01%
• 6M: -89.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 13.06%
• 1M: 109.55%
• YTD: -42.45%
• 6M: -24.19%
• 1Y: 91.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAMD vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DAMD Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF	-90.01%	22.15%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-42.45%	50.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DAMD and MSTZ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

DAMD vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 27
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAMD vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF (DAMD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAMD	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	-0.53	-0.18

Drawdowns

DAMD vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAMD drawdown since its inception was -93.52%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAMD and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAMD	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.52%	-99.36%	+5.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-84.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.57%	-97.98%	+6.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.60%	-94.41%	+54.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	40.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DAMD	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	38.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	125.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.28%	140.64%	-2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	138.28%	170.30%	-32.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	138.28%	170.30%	-32.02%

DAMD vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAMD has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAMD vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAMD nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAMD and MSTZ in my portfolio?

DAMD and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DAMD or MSTZ?

On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAMD or MSTZ?

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for DAMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAMD or MSTZ?

DAMD and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DAMD and MSTZ?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for DAMD and 1.05% for MSTZ.