DAK vs. FTIF

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DAK (Dakota Active Equity ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DAK is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past year, DAK returned 20.52% vs 33.91% for FTIF. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DAK charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

DAK vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAK achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 24.04% return.

DAK

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 0.91%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.77%

FTIF

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 4.50%
• 6M: 14.08%
• YTD: 24.04%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 10.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DAK Dakota Active Equity ETF	$1.23K	$2.63K	$4.01K
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	$126.29K	$72.10K	$61.82K

DAK vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DAK Dakota Active Equity ETF	10.36%	6.75%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	24.04%	3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between DAK and FTIF is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

DAK vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DAK

DAK Risk / Return Rank: 72
DAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DAK Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
DAK Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 88
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DAK vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAK	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	2.06	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.85	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.36	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	4.88	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.16	14.19	-4.03

DAK vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAK Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAK and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAK vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAK drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAK and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAK	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-27.83%	+19.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.87%	-6.34%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-1.90%	+1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-5.90%	+4.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	2.20%	-0.33%

Volatility

DAK vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 2.73%. This indicates that DAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAK	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.73%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	10.51%	-1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	15.04%	-3.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.39%	18.73%	-7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.39%	18.73%	-7.34%

DAK vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAK vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

DAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than FTIF's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DAK Dakota Active Equity ETF	0.75%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.08%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAK and FTIF in my portfolio?

DAK and FTIF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAK or FTIF?

DAK has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FTIF (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAK dropped -7.87% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

Which ETF is better, DAK or FTIF?

On 1-year performance, FTIF leads with 33.91% vs 20.52% for DAK. On fees, DAK is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAK or FTIF?

Over the 1-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 33.91% return vs 20.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAK or FTIF?

DAK is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAK or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.75% for DAK.

What is the main difference between DAK and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: Dakota Wealth and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DAK and 0.60% for FTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.