DAGVX vs. MPBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX).
DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. MPBFX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 2, 2000.
Performance
DAGVX vs. MPBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAGVX vs. MPBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 2.23% | 18.20% | 14.16% | 12.54% | 1.43% | 30.90% | 3.66% | 26.74% | -10.76% | 14.78% |
MPBFX BNY Mellon Bond Fund | -0.45% | 7.20% | 1.08% | 5.48% | -13.55% | -1.50% | 7.87% | 8.82% | -0.53% | 3.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than MPBFX's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has outperformed MPBFX with an annualized return of 12.72%, while MPBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.59% annualized return.
DAGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
MPBFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAGVX vs. MPBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than MPBFX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAGVX vs. MPBFX — Risk / Return Rank
DAGVX
MPBFX
DAGVX vs. MPBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAGVX | MPBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.92 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.32 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.54 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 4.40 | +2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAGVX | MPBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.92 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | -0.02 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.33 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.84 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAGVX and MPBFX is -0.19. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
DAGVX vs. MPBFX - Dividend Comparison
DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than MPBFX's 3.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 6.54% | 6.69% | 6.85% | 5.09% | 7.96% | 21.64% | 2.64% | 3.29% | 17.81% | 10.71% | 2.72% | 15.78% |
MPBFX BNY Mellon Bond Fund | 3.53% | 3.82% | 3.70% | 3.17% | 2.86% | 2.33% | 4.64% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.89% | 3.12% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
DAGVX vs. MPBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than MPBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and MPBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAGVX | MPBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.04% | -18.40% | -36.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -2.58% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -18.40% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.62% | -18.40% | -24.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | -3.18% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -2.40% | -5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 0.91% | +1.86% |
Volatility
DAGVX vs. MPBFX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) at 1.57%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAGVX | MPBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 1.57% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 2.49% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 4.20% | +12.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 5.83% | +9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 4.82% | +14.00% |