DAGVX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DAGVX or VOO.
Key characteristics
DAGVX | VOO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 21.86% | 26.88% |
1Y Return | 30.75% | 37.59% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 12.07% | 10.23% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 14.87% | 15.93% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 11.64% | 13.41% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.77 | 3.06 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.81 | 4.08 |
Omega Ratio | 1.51 | 1.58 |
Calmar Ratio | 5.25 | 4.43 |
Martin Ratio | 18.45 | 20.25 |
Ulcer Index | 1.68% | 1.85% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.16% | 12.23% |
Max Drawdown | -54.89% | -33.99% |
Current Drawdown | -1.11% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAGVX and VOO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DAGVX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 21.86% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.88% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.64%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAGVX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DAGVX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DAGVX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than VOO's 1.23% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 0.63% | 0.77% | 0.72% | 1.11% | 0.58% | 1.51% | 2.06% | 0.96% | 1.26% | 1.14% | 0.91% | 0.65% |
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
DAGVX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -54.89%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DAGVX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.89%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.