DAGVX vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DAGVX (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX returned 13.38%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for VTV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DAGVX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

DAGVX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DAGVX having a 12.68% return and VTV slightly lower at 12.28%. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 13.38%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.48% annualized return.

DAGVX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: 12.68%
• 6M: 15.35%
• 1Y: 28.78%
• 3Y*: 19.25%
• 5Y*: 12.97%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

VTV

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: 12.28%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 26.90%
• 3Y*: 18.27%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAGVX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	12.68%	18.20%	14.16%	12.54%	1.43%	30.90%	3.66%	26.74%	-10.76%	14.78%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	12.28%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DAGVX and VTV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004	0.96

The correlation between DAGVX and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DAGVX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAGVX

DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 75
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 81
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAGVX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DAGVX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.67	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	3.82	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.48	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	4.27	+0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.26	16.15	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DAGVX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAGVX and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAGVX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.67	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.82	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.75	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.51	+0.06

Drawdowns

DAGVX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAGVX	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.04%	-59.27%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.69%	-6.35%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.96%	-14.52%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	-17.04%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.62%	-36.78%	-5.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	0.00%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-7.87%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.68%	+0.12%

Volatility

DAGVX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAGVX	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	2.65%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	7.59%	+1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	10.11%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	13.88%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	16.67%	+2.16%

DAGVX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAGVX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	5.93%	6.69%	6.85%	5.09%	7.96%	21.64%	2.64%	3.29%	17.81%	10.71%	2.72%	15.78%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.86%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAGVX and VTV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, DAGVX and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DAGVX or VTV?

DAGVX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAGVX dropped -55.04% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.