DAGVX vs. VTV

In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 2.05%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current DAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAGVX and VTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than VTV's 2.29% yield.

The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and VTV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 4.70%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.