DABS vs. VRTL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while VRTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DABS returned 5.66% vs 442.54% for VRTL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. DABS charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.

Performance

DABS vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 230.54% return.

DABS

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 5.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTL

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -3.10%
• YTD: 230.54%
• 6M: 160.92%
• 1Y: 442.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DABS vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	0.88%	5.76%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	230.54%	108.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DABS and VRTL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

DABS vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DABS

DABS Risk / Return Rank: 78
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 87
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DABS vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DABS	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	3.91	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	3.49	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.43	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	9.40	-5.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.21	24.03	-8.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DABS vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DABS Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the VRTL Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DABS and VRTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DABS	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	3.91	-1.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.05	3.29	-1.24

Drawdowns

DABS vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum VRTL drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and VRTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DABS	VRTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-60.58%	+59.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-47.45%	+46.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-24.11%	+23.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-15.16%	+14.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	18.53%	-18.16%

Volatility

DABS vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is 0.71%, while GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a volatility of 33.79%. This indicates that DABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DABS	VRTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	33.79%	-33.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.60%	87.48%	-85.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49%	114.32%	-111.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.56%	124.39%	-121.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.56%	124.39%	-121.83%

DABS vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DABS vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.89%	3.81%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DABS and VRTL in my portfolio?

DABS and VRTL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DABS or VRTL?

VRTL has higher volatility (33.79%) compared to DABS (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs VRTL's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, DABS or VRTL?

On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 442.54% vs 5.66% for DABS. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DABS or VRTL?

Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 442.54% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DABS or VRTL?

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DABS or VRTL?

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

What is the main difference between DABS and VRTL?

DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while VRTL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 1.50% for VRTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.