PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DABS vs. SPCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DABS vs. SPCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than SPCK's 0.87% return.


DABS

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.36%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPCK

1D
-1.08%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
0.87%
6M
0.77%
1Y
-0.12%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DABS vs. SPCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
1.10%5.63%
SPCK
SPAC and New Issue ETF
0.87%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DABS and SPCK is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DABS vs. SPCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPCK
SPCK Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SPCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPCK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SPCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPCK Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DABS vs. SPCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DABSSPCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.00

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

-0.02

+3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

-0.05

+12.99

DABS vs. SPCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DABS Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the SPCK Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DABS and SPCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DABS vs. SPCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum SPCK drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and SPCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DABSSPCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-28.28%

+26.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-5.24%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-17.48%

+17.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-18.83%

+18.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

2.40%

-2.02%

Volatility

DABS vs. SPCK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is 0.67%, while SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCK) has a volatility of 2.51%. This indicates that DABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DABSSPCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

2.51%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

4.32%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46%

8.72%

-6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.55%

8.27%

-5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.55%

9.23%

-6.68%

DABS vs. SPCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SPCK's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DABS vs. SPCK - Dividend Comparison

DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than SPCK's 16.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
4.88%3.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPCK
SPAC and New Issue ETF
16.34%16.48%0.69%2.27%0.00%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


DABS and SPCK have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPCK has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to DABS (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs SPCK's -28.28%.

On 1-year performance, DABS leads with 4.88% vs -0.12% for SPCK. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DABS has performed better with a 4.88% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SPCK.

SPCK has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 4.88% for DABS.

DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while SPCK is Event Driven. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Tuttle Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.95% for SPCK.

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DABS and SPCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer