PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DABS vs. RISR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DABS vs. RISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than RISR's 2.78% return.


DABS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.22%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RISR

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
2.78%
6M
3.60%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DABS vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DABS and RISR is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DABS vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RISR
RISR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DABS vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DABSRISRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.14

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

1.62

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

3.81

+11.40

DABS vs. RISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DABS Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the RISR Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DABS and RISR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DABSRISRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.78

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.05

1.24

+0.81

Drawdowns

DABS vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum RISR drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and RISR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DABSRISRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-14.31%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-2.61%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.71%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-2.19%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

1.11%

-0.74%

Volatility

DABS vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is 0.71%, while FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that DABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DABSRISRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

1.27%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

4.09%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49%

5.44%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.56%

11.85%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.56%

11.85%

-9.29%

DABS vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

DABS vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison

DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than RISR's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
4.89%3.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.93%5.95%5.67%7.96%4.26%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


DABS and RISR have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RISR has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to DABS (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs RISR's -14.31%.

On 1-year performance, DABS leads with 5.66% vs 4.20% for RISR. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DABS has performed better with a 5.66% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.

RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 4.89% for DABS.

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 1.13% for RISR.

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DABS and RISR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer