PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DABS vs. DCPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DABS vs. DCPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than DCPE's -1.70% return.


DABS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.22%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCPE

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DABS vs. DCPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DABS and DCPE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DABS vs. DCPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DCPE
DCPE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DCPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCPE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DCPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCPE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DABS vs. DCPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DABSDCPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.06

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

0.34

+4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

1.24

+13.96

DABS vs. DCPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DABS Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the DCPE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DABS and DCPE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DABSDCPEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.30

+1.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.05

0.42

+1.63

Drawdowns

DABS vs. DCPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum DCPE drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and DCPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DABSDCPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-22.07%

+20.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-9.68%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-4.83%

+4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-4.93%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

2.65%

-2.28%

Volatility

DABS vs. DCPE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is 0.71%, while DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that DABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DABSDCPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

2.63%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

8.04%

-6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49%

10.89%

-8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.56%

16.93%

-14.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.56%

16.93%

-14.37%

DABS vs. DCPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DCPE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DABS vs. DCPE - Dividend Comparison

DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than DCPE's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
4.89%3.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DCPE
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF
1.41%1.39%1.23%1.01%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


DABS and DCPE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCPE has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to DABS (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs DCPE's -22.07%.

On 1-year performance, DABS leads with 5.66% vs 3.29% for DCPE. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DABS has performed better with a 5.66% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DCPE.

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 1.41% for DCPE.

DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while DCPE is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.65% for DCPE.

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DABS and DCPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer