DAADX vs. LZEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX).
DAADX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 14, 2021. LZEMX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Jul 14, 1994.
Performance
DAADX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAADX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio | 5.71% | 27.59% | 3.44% | 24.58% | -15.81% | 0.20% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 6.61% | 41.35% | 7.60% | 22.44% | -14.86% | -1.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAADX achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 6.61% return.
DAADX
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -9.55%
- YTD
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LZEMX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.90%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAADX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAADX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAADX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank
DAADX
LZEMX
DAADX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAADX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.95 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 3.72 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.57 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.86 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.55 | 14.21 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAADX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.95 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.39 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAADX and LZEMX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAADX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison
DAADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than LZEMX's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio | 2.37% | 2.28% | 2.64% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 1.92% | 2.05% | 3.11% | 3.76% | 5.92% | 4.89% | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
DAADX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAADX drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAADX and LZEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAADX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -60.08% | +35.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -10.42% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -9.04% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -16.71% | +9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 2.89% | +0.42% |
Volatility
DAADX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 6.23%. This indicates that DAADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAADX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 6.23% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 9.72% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 14.30% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 14.11% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 16.34% | -2.42% |