PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYH.TO achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than ZPR.TO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CYH.TO has underperformed ZPR.TO with an annualized return of 7.60%, while ZPR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.40% annualized return.


CYH.TO

1D
0.18%
1M
2.99%
6M
9.42%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
7.60%

ZPR.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
2.09%
6M
7.62%
YTD
8.50%
1Y
16.77%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
13.17%18.78%12.28%3.85%-2.46%23.39%-8.70%9.23%-6.21%13.17%
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
8.50%18.58%26.58%7.21%-17.66%23.77%6.00%1.94%-9.77%14.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CYH.TO and ZPR.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2012

0.25

The correlation between CYH.TO and ZPR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYH.TO
CYH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPR.TO
ZPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CYH.TOZPR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.81

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

6.83

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

38.94

-23.94

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYH.TO and ZPR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, which is greater than ZPR.TO's maximum drawdown of -44.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYH.TO and ZPR.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYH.TOZPR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-44.72%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-2.47%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

-8.75%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

-23.06%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.90%

-44.13%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-9.20%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.43%

+1.03%

Volatility

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) at 0.94%. This indicates that CYH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYH.TOZPR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

0.94%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

2.71%

+4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

4.31%

+5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

8.32%

+5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

11.42%

+5.70%

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYH.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPR.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CYH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Dividend Comparison

CYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than ZPR.TO's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
3.23%3.77%4.33%4.68%4.72%3.89%4.51%4.18%3.98%3.03%3.39%3.84%
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
5.03%4.86%4.93%5.92%5.97%4.66%5.48%5.09%4.82%4.08%5.14%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYH.TO and ZPR.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPR.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPR.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CYH.TO.

CYH.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while ZPR.TO is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. CYH.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while ZPR.TO tracks Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for CYH.TO and 0.45% for ZPR.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYH.TO and ZPR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer