PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CYH.TO (iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and ZEQT.TO (BMO All-Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CYH.TO is passively managed, while ZEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CYH.TO returned 16.48%/yr vs 22.68%/yr for ZEQT.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CYH.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ZEQT.TO.

Performance

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYH.TO achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than ZEQT.TO's 13.63% return.

CYH.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
10.22%
6M
11.20%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
8.21%

ZEQT.TO

1D
0.52%
1M
6.10%
YTD
13.63%
6M
13.00%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		10.22%18.77%12.29%3.84%-3.24%
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF		13.63%19.67%25.44%16.79%-5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CYH.TO and ZEQT.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.53

The correlation between CYH.TO and ZEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CYH.TO
ZEQT.TO

Financial Services

23.4%
19.8%

Utilities

15.9%
2.9%

Energy

14.2%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
8.3%

Communication Services

8.2%
6.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
6.9%

Industrials

4.9%
11.2%

Basic Materials

3.6%
7.4%

Technology

3.4%
22.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.0%

Financial Services

CYH.TO
23.4%
ZEQT.TO
19.8%

Utilities

CYH.TO
15.9%
ZEQT.TO
2.9%

Energy

CYH.TO
14.2%
ZEQT.TO
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

CYH.TO
11.9%
ZEQT.TO
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CYH.TO
8.4%
ZEQT.TO
8.3%

Communication Services

CYH.TO
8.2%
ZEQT.TO
6.8%

Healthcare

CYH.TO
5.1%
ZEQT.TO
6.9%

Industrials

CYH.TO
4.9%
ZEQT.TO
11.2%

Basic Materials

CYH.TO
3.6%
ZEQT.TO
7.4%

Technology

CYH.TO
3.4%
ZEQT.TO
22.4%

Real Estate

CYH.TO
1.1%
ZEQT.TO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

BMO All-Equity ETF

Often compared with CYH.TO:
CYH.TO vs. XDG.TOCYH.TO vs. CUD.TOCYH.TO vs. VDY.TOCYH.TO vs. XEI.TOCYH.TO vs. ZDIVXCYH.TO vs. XDIV.TOCYH.TO vs. VEQT.TO
Often compared with ZEQT.TO:
ZEQT.TO vs. XEQT.TOZEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOZEQT.TO vs. ZSP.TOZEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOZEQT.TO vs. HEQT.TOZEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO

Return for Risk

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CYH.TO
CYH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO
ZEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CYH.TOZEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.39
2.58

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.38
3.57

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.47

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

3.77

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

15.90

+1.15

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYH.TO and ZEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CYH.TOZEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.58

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.20

-0.88

Drawdowns

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.48%, which is greater than ZEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYH.TO and ZEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CYH.TOZEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.48%

-16.87%

-44.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-8.72%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-15.34%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.30%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.64%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-3.01%

-6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.06%

-0.67%

Volatility

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) is 2.62%, while BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that CYH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CYH.TOZEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

5.21%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

10.42%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

12.75%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

13.85%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

13.85%

+3.17%

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYH.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQT.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CYH.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

CYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than ZEQT.TO's 1.28% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		3.33%3.77%4.33%4.68%4.72%3.89%4.51%4.01%3.98%3.03%3.39%3.84%
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF		1.28%1.45%1.69%2.13%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

CYH.TO and ZEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CYH.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for CYH.TO and 0.18% for ZEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYH.TO and ZEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer