CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO
CYH.TO (iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and BGIE.TO (Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CYH.TO is passively managed, while BGIE.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CYH.TO returned 8.53%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for BGIE.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYH.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BGIE.TO.
Performance
CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYH.TO achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than BGIE.TO's 14.42% return.
CYH.TO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
BGIE.TO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 26.54%
- 3Y*
- 23.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- —
CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYH.TO iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 10.22% | 18.77% | 12.29% | 3.84% | -2.47% | 23.43% | 21.22% |
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 14.42% | 21.56% | 24.37% | 5.45% | -2.37% | 18.61% | 10.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYH.TO and BGIE.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2020 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CYH.TO
BGIE.TO
CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CYH.TO | BGIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 3.21 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.05 | 11.04 | +6.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CYH.TO | BGIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.82 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.92 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.98 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.48%, which is greater than BGIE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYH.TO and BGIE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYH.TO | BGIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.48% | -18.24% | -43.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.34% | -8.35% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.13% | -17.02% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.67% | -18.24% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -2.50% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -4.45% | -5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 2.42% | -1.03% |
Volatility
CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) is 2.62%, while Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that CYH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGIE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYH.TO | BGIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 4.62% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 11.54% | -4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.96% | 14.73% | -4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 15.86% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 15.27% | +1.75% |
CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CYH.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIE.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CYH.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Dividend Comparison
CYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than BGIE.TO's 4.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 4.86% | 4.95% | 4.89% | 5.19% | 4.79% | 4.10% | 3.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CYH.TO iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 3.33% | 3.77% | 4.33% | 4.68% | 4.72% | 3.89% | 4.51% | 4.01% | 3.98% | 3.03% | 3.39% | 3.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CYH.TO and BGIE.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CYH.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CYH.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BGIE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brompton. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for CYH.TO and 0.75% for BGIE.TO.
Find the right allocation for CYH.TO and BGIE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer