BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO).
BGIE.TO and FCIN.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BGIE.TO is an actively managed fund by Brompton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2020. FCIN.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 1, 2024.
Performance
BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 10.08% | 21.56% | 23.72% |
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF | 7.79% | 26.32% | 9.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGIE.TO achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than FCIN.NEO's 7.79% return.
BGIE.TO
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FCIN.NEO
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 24.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
BGIE.TO
FCIN.NEO
BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGIE.TO | FCIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 1.58 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.20 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 2.28 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 9.09 | +2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGIE.TO | FCIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.58 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.49 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGIE.TO and FCIN.NEO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison
BGIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, while FCIN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 4.83% | 4.95% | 4.89% | 5.19% | 4.79% | 4.10% | 3.07% |
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.24%, which is greater than FCIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIE.TO and FCIN.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGIE.TO | FCIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.24% | -12.34% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -9.77% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -4.04% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -1.54% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.52% | +0.20% |
Volatility
BGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) is 6.02%, while Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that BGIE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGIE.TO | FCIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 6.67% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 10.37% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 15.63% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 13.87% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 13.87% | +1.40% |