CYBR vs. GTLB
CYBR (CyberArk Software Ltd.) and GTLB (GitLab Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CYBR in Software - Infrastructure, GTLB in Software - Application. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CYBR vs. GTLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CYBR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTLB
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- 32.31%
- YTD
- -15.21%
- 6M
- -26.63%
- 1Y
- -30.14%
- 3Y*
- -1.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CYBR vs. GTLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. | -8.34% | 33.89% | 52.09% | 68.95% | -25.18% | -4.58% |
GTLB GitLab Inc. | -15.21% | -33.40% | -10.50% | 38.56% | -47.77% | -16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYBR and GTLB is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CYBR and GTLB has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CYBR:
$20.69B
GTLB:
$5.41B
CYBR:
-$2.92
GTLB:
-$0.15
CYBR:
15.13
GTLB:
5.29
CYBR:
8.61
GTLB:
5.49
CYBR:
$1.36B
GTLB:
$1.00B
CYBR:
$1.01B
GTLB:
$871.68M
CYBR:
$59.13M
GTLB:
-$42.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYBR vs. GTLB — Risk / Return Rank
CYBR
GTLB
CYBR vs. GTLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and GitLab Inc. (GTLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CYBR | GTLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.30 | — |
Drawdowns
CYBR vs. GTLB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYBR | GTLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -85.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -61.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -75.69% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -60.98% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.61% | — |
Volatility
CYBR vs. GTLB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYBR | GTLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 58.93% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 74.64% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 74.64% | — |
Dividends
CYBR vs. GTLB - Dividend Comparison
Neither CYBR nor GTLB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CYBR vs. GTLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CyberArk Software Ltd. and GitLab Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CYBR vs. GTLB - Profitability Comparison
CYBR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.
GTLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported a gross profit of 226.67M and revenue of 264.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.8%.
CYBR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.
GTLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported an operating income of -15.75M and revenue of 264.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.
CYBR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
GTLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported a net income of -4.97M and revenue of 264.16M, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CYBR and GTLB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CYBR and GTLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer