PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CYBR vs. GTLB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CYBRGTLB
YTD Return34.47%-4.46%
1Y Return60.13%34.84%
3Y Return (Ann)14.47%-21.74%
Sharpe Ratio2.230.69
Sortino Ratio3.101.31
Omega Ratio1.391.18
Calmar Ratio3.130.57
Martin Ratio7.831.40
Ulcer Index7.91%27.82%
Daily Std Dev27.85%56.98%
Max Drawdown-55.64%-79.55%
Current Drawdown-1.83%-54.04%

Fundamentals


CYBRGTLB
Market Cap$12.84B$9.71B
EPS-$0.29-$2.34
Total Revenue (TTM)$670.96M$515.55M
Gross Profit (TTM)$538.27M$459.42M
EBITDA (TTM)-$22.31M-$114.18M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CYBR and GTLB is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CYBR vs. GTLB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CYBR achieves a 34.47% return, which is significantly higher than GTLB's -4.46% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
25.87%
12.91%
CYBR
GTLB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CYBR vs. GTLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and GitLab Inc. (GTLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CYBR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CYBR, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CYBR, currently valued at 3.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CYBR, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CYBR, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CYBR, currently valued at 7.83, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.83
GTLB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.40

CYBR vs. GTLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBR Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the GTLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBR and GTLB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.23
0.69
CYBR
GTLB

Dividends

CYBR vs. GTLB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CYBR nor GTLB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CYBR vs. GTLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBR drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, smaller than the maximum GTLB drawdown of -79.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBR and GTLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.83%
-54.04%
CYBR
GTLB

Volatility

CYBR vs. GTLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) is 7.77%, while GitLab Inc. (GTLB) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that CYBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.77%
11.61%
CYBR
GTLB

Financials

CYBR vs. GTLB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CyberArk Software Ltd. and GitLab Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items