PortfoliosLab logo
GTLB vs. PATH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GTLB and PATH is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

GTLB vs. PATH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GitLab Inc. (GTLB) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-54.61%
-77.41%
GTLB
PATH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GTLB:

-0.27

PATH:

-0.71

Sortino Ratio

GTLB:

0.01

PATH:

-0.72

Omega Ratio

GTLB:

1.00

PATH:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

GTLB:

-0.23

PATH:

-0.46

Martin Ratio

GTLB:

-0.88

PATH:

-1.07

Ulcer Index

GTLB:

18.05%

PATH:

38.01%

Daily Std Dev

GTLB:

60.07%

PATH:

57.65%

Max Drawdown

GTLB:

-79.55%

PATH:

-88.50%

Current Drawdown

GTLB:

-63.97%

PATH:

-86.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GTLB:

$7.49B

PATH:

$6.24B

EPS

GTLB:

-$0.04

PATH:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

GTLB:

9.86

PATH:

4.37

PB Ratio

GTLB:

9.97

PATH:

3.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTLB:

$759.25M

PATH:

$1.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTLB:

$674.11M

PATH:

$1.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

GTLB:

-$130.52M

PATH:

-$148.55M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLB achieves a -16.31% return, which is significantly lower than PATH's -8.81% return.


GTLB

YTD

-16.31%

1M

-6.02%

6M

-14.44%

1Y

-14.97%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PATH

YTD

-8.81%

1M

6.62%

6M

-6.15%

1Y

-40.44%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GTLB vs. PATH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTLB is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTLB is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTLB is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTLB is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTLB is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTLB is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PATH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PATH is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PATH is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PATH is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PATH is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PATH is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PATH is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GTLB vs. PATH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GitLab Inc. (GTLB) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GTLB, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
GTLB: -0.27
PATH: -0.71
The chart of Sortino ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
GTLB: 0.01
PATH: -0.72
The chart of Omega ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
GTLB: 1.00
PATH: 0.89
The chart of Calmar ratio for GTLB, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
GTLB: -0.23
PATH: -0.49
The chart of Martin ratio for GTLB, currently valued at -0.88, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
GTLB: -0.88
PATH: -1.07

The current GTLB Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is higher than the PATH Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLB and PATH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.27
-0.71
GTLB
PATH

Dividends

GTLB vs. PATH - Dividend Comparison

Neither GTLB nor PATH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GTLB vs. PATH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLB drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, smaller than the maximum PATH drawdown of -88.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLB and PATH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-63.97%
-79.85%
GTLB
PATH

Volatility

GTLB vs. PATH - Volatility Comparison

GitLab Inc. (GTLB) has a higher volatility of 25.02% compared to UiPath Inc. (PATH) at 17.46%. This indicates that GTLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
25.02%
17.46%
GTLB
PATH

Financials

GTLB vs. PATH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GitLab Inc. and UiPath Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items