CYBR vs. PANW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).

Performance

CYBR vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CYBR vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd.	-8.34%	33.89%	52.09%	68.95%	-25.18%	7.23%	38.61%	57.24%	79.13%	-9.03%
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc.	-12.77%	1.23%	23.41%	111.32%	-24.81%	56.66%	53.68%	22.78%	29.95%	15.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CYBR : $20.69B PANW : $114.56B
EPS CYBR : -$2.92 PANW : $1.81
PS Ratio CYBR : 15.13 PANW : 11.52
PB Ratio CYBR : 8.61 PANW : 12.20
Total Revenue (TTM) CYBR : $1.36B PANW : $9.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) CYBR : $1.01B PANW : $7.27B
EBITDA (TTM) CYBR : $59.13M PANW : $2.04B

Returns By Period

CYBR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PANW

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 7.01%
• YTD: -12.77%
• 6M: -22.31%
• 1Y: -6.21%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: 24.06%
• 10Y*: 19.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CYBR vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANW

PANW Risk / Return Rank: 32
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBR vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CYBR	PANW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.61	—

Correlation

The correlation between CYBR and PANW is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CYBR vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CYBR nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CYBR	PANW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-47.98%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-36.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-27.42%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-14.72%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CYBR	PANW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	36.72%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	40.60%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	38.47%	—

Financials

CYBR vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CyberArk Software Ltd. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.91B and revenue of 2.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 397.00M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.