PortfoliosLab logo
GTLB vs. YELP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GTLB and YELP is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

GTLB vs. YELP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GitLab Inc. (GTLB) and Yelp Inc. (YELP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-55.19%
-11.47%
GTLB
YELP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GTLB:

-0.19

YELP:

-0.42

Sortino Ratio

GTLB:

0.14

YELP:

-0.40

Omega Ratio

GTLB:

1.02

YELP:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

GTLB:

-0.16

YELP:

-0.19

Martin Ratio

GTLB:

-0.60

YELP:

-0.98

Ulcer Index

GTLB:

18.73%

YELP:

12.81%

Daily Std Dev

GTLB:

59.83%

YELP:

30.15%

Max Drawdown

GTLB:

-79.55%

YELP:

-85.25%

Current Drawdown

GTLB:

-64.43%

YELP:

-64.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GTLB:

$7.70B

YELP:

$2.26B

EPS

GTLB:

-$0.04

YELP:

$1.88

PS Ratio

GTLB:

10.14

YELP:

1.60

PB Ratio

GTLB:

9.93

YELP:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTLB:

$590.06M

YELP:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTLB:

$523.70M

YELP:

$973.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

GTLB:

-$78.92M

YELP:

$182.11M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLB achieves a -17.39% return, which is significantly lower than YELP's -9.10% return.


GTLB

YTD

-17.39%

1M

-3.68%

6M

-18.25%

1Y

-14.46%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

YELP

YTD

-9.10%

1M

-8.31%

6M

3.75%

1Y

-12.05%

5Y*

9.72%

10Y*

-1.00%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GTLB vs. YELP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTLB is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTLB is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTLB is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTLB is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTLB is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTLB is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

YELP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YELP is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YELP is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YELP is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YELP is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YELP is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YELP is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GTLB vs. YELP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GitLab Inc. (GTLB) and Yelp Inc. (YELP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GTLB, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
GTLB: -0.19
YELP: -0.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
GTLB: 0.14
YELP: -0.40
The chart of Omega ratio for GTLB, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
GTLB: 1.02
YELP: 0.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for GTLB, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
GTLB: -0.16
YELP: -0.38
The chart of Martin ratio for GTLB, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market-40.00-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00
GTLB: -0.60
YELP: -0.98

The current GTLB Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is higher than the YELP Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLB and YELP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.19
-0.42
GTLB
YELP

Dividends

GTLB vs. YELP - Dividend Comparison

Neither GTLB nor YELP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GTLB vs. YELP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLB drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, smaller than the maximum YELP drawdown of -85.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLB and YELP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-64.43%
-27.36%
GTLB
YELP

Volatility

GTLB vs. YELP - Volatility Comparison

GitLab Inc. (GTLB) has a higher volatility of 24.47% compared to Yelp Inc. (YELP) at 14.10%. This indicates that GTLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YELP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
24.47%
14.10%
GTLB
YELP

Financials

GTLB vs. YELP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GitLab Inc. and Yelp Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
211.43M
361.95M
(GTLB) Total Revenue
(YELP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GTLB vs. YELP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GitLab Inc. and Yelp Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

86.0%88.0%90.0%92.0%94.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
89.2%
90.8%
(GTLB) Gross Margin
(YELP) Gross Margin
GTLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GitLab Inc. reported a gross profit of 188.56M and revenue of 211.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.
YELP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Yelp Inc. reported a gross profit of 328.68M and revenue of 361.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.8%.
GTLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GitLab Inc. reported an operating income of -19.34M and revenue of 211.43M, resulting in an operating margin of -9.2%.
YELP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Yelp Inc. reported an operating income of 53.43M and revenue of 361.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.
GTLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GitLab Inc. reported a net income of 5.80M and revenue of 211.43M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
YELP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Yelp Inc. reported a net income of 42.22M and revenue of 361.95M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.