CYBR.TO vs. XCLN.TO
CYBR.TO (Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units) and XCLN.TO (iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CYBR.TO is a fund fund, while XCLN.TO is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Over the past 3 years, CYBR.TO returned 25.26%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for XCLN.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CYBR.TO vs. XCLN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYBR.TO achieves a 35.74% return, which is significantly lower than XCLN.TO's 43.07% return.
CYBR.TO
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- 30.12%
- YTD
- 35.74%
- 6M
- 27.94%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 25.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
XCLN.TO
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- YTD
- 43.07%
- 6M
- 37.48%
- 1Y
- 84.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CYBR.TO vs. XCLN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR.TO Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units | 35.74% | 2.14% | 13.45% | 44.51% | -27.24% |
XCLN.TO iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF | 43.07% | 37.41% | -19.86% | -21.98% | 13.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYBR.TO and XCLN.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYBR.TO vs. XCLN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CYBR.TO
XCLN.TO
CYBR.TO vs. XCLN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) and iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CYBR.TO | XCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.49 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 7.00 | -6.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 19.91 | -18.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CYBR.TO | XCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 3.15 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.33 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
CYBR.TO vs. XCLN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYBR.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, smaller than the maximum XCLN.TO drawdown of -49.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBR.TO and XCLN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYBR.TO | XCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -49.29% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.10% | -12.10% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.10% | -39.31% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -0.98% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -25.54% | +12.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | 4.25% | +8.94% |
Volatility
CYBR.TO vs. XCLN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) at 10.50%. This indicates that CYBR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCLN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYBR.TO | XCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | 10.50% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.55% | 20.24% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 26.95% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 25.50% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.69% | 25.50% | +1.19% |
Dividends
CYBR.TO vs. XCLN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CYBR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than XCLN.TO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR.TO Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 0.26% | 0.38% | 0.64% | 0.79% |
XCLN.TO iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.15% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CYBR.TO and XCLN.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CYBR.TO and XCLN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer