PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYBIX vs. CSIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYBIX vs. CSIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) and Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBIX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than CSIFX's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CYBIX has underperformed CSIFX with an annualized return of 3.97%, while CSIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.13% annualized return.


CYBIX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.82%
6M
0.15%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
3.97%
ALL TIME*
5.04%

CSIFX

1D
1.60%
1M
-0.21%
6M
2.51%
YTD
2.66%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.13%
ALL TIME*
7.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CYBIX vs. CSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYBIX
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund
0.40%7.73%6.70%10.02%-11.50%3.66%5.46%12.82%-2.53%6.09%
CSIFX
Calvert Balanced Fund
2.66%11.32%18.96%16.35%-15.33%14.30%15.43%23.71%-2.75%10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBIX and CSIFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2001

0.37

Over the past year, CYBIX and CSIFX have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYBIX vs. CSIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CYBIX
CYBIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CYBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CSIFX
CSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CYBIX vs. CSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) and Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CYBIXCSIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.15

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

0.95

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

3.95

+3.81

CYBIX vs. CSIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the CSIFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBIX and CSIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CYBIX vs. CSIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBIX drawdown since its inception was -32.13%, smaller than the maximum CSIFX drawdown of -38.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBIX and CSIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYBIXCSIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-38.68%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-7.98%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.29%

-11.86%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-19.95%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.55%

-23.77%

+6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-1.40%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-5.29%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

1.93%

-1.41%

Volatility

CYBIX vs. CSIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) is 0.69%, while Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that CYBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYBIXCSIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

2.87%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

7.58%

-5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

9.31%

-6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.57%

11.00%

-6.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

11.10%

-6.50%

CYBIX vs. CSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYBIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than CSIFX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

CYBIX vs. CSIFX - Dividend Comparison

CYBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than CSIFX's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSIFX
Calvert Balanced Fund
4.37%4.76%5.23%2.37%2.32%7.61%2.43%3.45%5.25%7.41%2.68%12.56%
CYBIX
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund
5.39%5.44%5.25%4.47%4.12%4.22%4.49%4.98%5.20%4.92%5.51%5.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYBIX and CSIFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSIFX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to CYBIX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYBIX dropped -32.13% vs CSIFX's -38.68%.

CYBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYBIX and CSIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer