CSIFX vs. CFICX
CSIFX (Calvert Balanced Fund) and CFICX (Calvert Income Fund) are both mutual funds - CSIFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Calvert Research and Management, while CFICX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Calvert Research and Management. Over the past 10 years, CSIFX returned 9.53%/yr vs 2.96%/yr for CFICX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSIFX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for CFICX.
Performance
CSIFX vs. CFICX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIFX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly higher than CFICX's 0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CSIFX has outperformed CFICX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while CFICX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return.
CSIFX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
CFICX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
CSIFX vs. CFICX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIFX Calvert Balanced Fund | 3.60% | 11.32% | 18.96% | 16.35% | -15.33% | 14.30% | 15.43% | 23.71% | -2.75% | 10.72% |
CFICX Calvert Income Fund | 0.45% | 8.94% | 4.11% | 7.61% | -16.07% | 1.71% | 8.26% | 14.75% | -3.36% | 6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIFX and CFICX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1986 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, CSIFX and CFICX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIFX vs. CFICX — Risk / Return Rank
CSIFX
CFICX
CSIFX vs. CFICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) and Calvert Income Fund (CFICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIFX | CFICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.85 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 5.89 | +1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIFX vs. CFICX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.68%, which is greater than CFICX's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIFX and CFICX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIFX | CFICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.68% | -21.28% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -3.08% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -6.11% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.95% | -21.28% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -21.28% | -2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.21% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -3.45% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 0.96% | +0.90% |
Volatility
CSIFX vs. CFICX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) at 1.33%. This indicates that CSIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIFX | CFICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 1.33% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 2.92% | +4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 3.69% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 5.65% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 5.22% | +5.88% |
CSIFX vs. CFICX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than CFICX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIFX vs. CFICX - Dividend Comparison
CSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than CFICX's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFICX Calvert Income Fund | 4.75% | 4.86% | 4.91% | 4.05% | 3.22% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 3.25% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 2.87% |
CSIFX Calvert Balanced Fund | 4.31% | 4.76% | 5.23% | 2.37% | 2.32% | 7.61% | 2.43% | 3.45% | 5.25% | 7.41% | 2.68% | 12.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIFX and CFICX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSIFX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to CFICX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIFX dropped -38.68% vs CFICX's -21.28%.
CFICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSIFX and CFICX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer