PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSIFX vs. CFICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSIFX vs. CFICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) and Calvert Income Fund (CFICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSIFX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly higher than CFICX's 0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CSIFX has outperformed CFICX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while CFICX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return.


CSIFX

1D
0.89%
1M
0.51%
YTD
3.60%
6M
3.60%
1Y
13.79%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
9.53%

CFICX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.99%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
2.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSIFX vs. CFICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSIFX
Calvert Balanced Fund
3.60%11.32%18.96%16.35%-15.33%14.30%15.43%23.71%-2.75%10.72%
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
0.45%8.94%4.11%7.61%-16.07%1.71%8.26%14.75%-3.36%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CSIFX and CFICX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1986

0.18

Over the past year, CSIFX and CFICX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSIFX vs. CFICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSIFX
CSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

CFICX
CFICX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CFICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFICX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CFICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFICX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSIFX vs. CFICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) and Calvert Income Fund (CFICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSIFXCFICXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.85

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

5.89

+1.43

CSIFX vs. CFICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the CFICX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSIFX and CFICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSIFX vs. CFICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.68%, which is greater than CFICX's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIFX and CFICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSIFXCFICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.68%

-21.28%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-3.08%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-6.11%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.95%

-21.28%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-21.28%

-2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.21%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-3.45%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

0.96%

+0.90%

Volatility

CSIFX vs. CFICX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) at 1.33%. This indicates that CSIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSIFXCFICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

1.33%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

2.92%

+4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

3.69%

+5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

5.65%

+5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.10%

5.22%

+5.88%

CSIFX vs. CFICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSIFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than CFICX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSIFX vs. CFICX - Dividend Comparison

CSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than CFICX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
4.75%4.86%4.91%4.05%3.22%2.70%2.96%3.25%3.60%2.96%3.23%2.87%
CSIFX
Calvert Balanced Fund
4.31%4.76%5.23%2.37%2.32%7.61%2.43%3.45%5.25%7.41%2.68%12.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSIFX and CFICX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSIFX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to CFICX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIFX dropped -38.68% vs CFICX's -21.28%.

CFICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSIFX and CFICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer