PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYBIX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYBIX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBIX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CYBIX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 4.26%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.


CYBIX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.56%
6M
1.33%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
4.26%

BND

1D
0.03%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBIX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYBIX
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund
0.56%7.73%6.70%10.02%-11.50%3.66%5.46%12.82%-2.53%6.09%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.46%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBIX and BND is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007

0.15

Over the past year, CYBIX and BND have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYBIX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBIX
CYBIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
CYBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBIX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CYBIXBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

1.38

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

2.07

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.24

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.85

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.51

5.66

+6.86

CYBIX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBIX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CYBIXBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.38

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.03

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.29

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.59

+0.48

Drawdowns

CYBIX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBIX drawdown since its inception was -32.13%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBIX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYBIXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-18.58%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-2.68%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.62%

-5.92%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-17.91%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.55%

-18.58%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-2.18%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-3.06%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.88%

-0.40%

Volatility

CYBIX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) is 1.05%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that CYBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYBIXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.26%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

2.68%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

3.78%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.56%

6.02%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.62%

5.53%

-0.91%

CYBIX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYBIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CYBIX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

CYBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
CYBIX
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund
5.83%5.44%5.25%4.47%4.12%4.22%4.49%4.98%5.20%4.92%5.51%5.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYBIX and BND have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to CYBIX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYBIX dropped -32.13% vs BND's -18.58%.

CYBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYBIX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer