CXSE vs. NBCE
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and NBCE (Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds. CXSE is passively managed, while NBCE is actively managed. Over the past year, CXSE returned 24.36% vs 62.13% for NBCE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NBCE.
Performance
CXSE vs. NBCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than NBCE's 25.89% return.
CXSE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- -8.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
NBCE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 8.36%
- YTD
- 25.89%
- 6M
- 30.43%
- 1Y
- 62.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXSE vs. NBCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 0.93% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -4.71% |
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF | 25.89% | 39.08% | 3.35% | -2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and NBCE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CXSE and NBCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
CXSE vs. NBCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CXSE
NBCE
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
CXSE
NBCE
Technology
CXSE
NBCE
Industrials
CXSE
NBCE
Communication Services
CXSE
NBCE
Healthcare
CXSE
NBCE
Financial Services
CXSE
NBCE
Consumer Defensive
CXSE
NBCE
Basic Materials
CXSE
NBCE
Real Estate
CXSE
NBCE
Energy
CXSE
NBCE
Utilities
CXSE
NBCE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. NBCE — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
NBCE
CXSE vs. NBCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXSE | NBCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.58 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 6.77 | -5.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 22.69 | -19.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXSE | NBCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 3.36 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 1.02 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. NBCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than NBCE's maximum drawdown of -28.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and NBCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | NBCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -28.42% | -41.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -9.23% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.01% | -0.48% | -45.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.83% | -9.13% | -18.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.42% | 2.75% | +5.67% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. NBCE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) have volatilities of 7.29% and 7.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | NBCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 7.20% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 13.42% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 18.59% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.30% | 24.04% | +8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 24.04% | +4.66% |
CXSE vs. NBCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than NBCE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. NBCE - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than NBCE's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.99% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF | 1.05% | 1.32% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXSE and NBCE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXSE has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to NBCE (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs NBCE's -28.42%.
On 1-year performance, NBCE leads with 62.13% vs 24.36% for CXSE. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NBCE has performed better with a 62.13% return vs 24.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for NBCE.
CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.05% for NBCE.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.74% for NBCE.
NBCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and NBCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer