PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXSE vs. CNQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXSE vs. CNQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than CNQQ's 12.03% return.


CXSE

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.56%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
11.14%
5Y*
-8.14%
10Y*
7.22%

CNQQ

1D
0.38%
1M
7.11%
YTD
12.03%
6M
12.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXSE vs. CNQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and CNQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXSE vs. CNQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CNQQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXSE vs. CNQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXSECNQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

CXSE vs. CNQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXSECNQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.33

-0.14

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. CNQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than CNQQ's maximum drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and CNQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXSECNQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-17.82%

-52.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.21%

-1.09%

-45.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.84%

-9.19%

-18.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.45%

Volatility

CXSE vs. CNQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXSECNQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

24.37%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.29%

24.37%

+7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.69%

24.37%

+4.32%

CXSE vs. CNQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CNQQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXSE vs. CNQQ - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than CNQQ's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQQ
Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF
0.23%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.99%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CXSE and CNQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.

CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.23% for CNQQ.

CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while CNQQ tracks Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Rayliant. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.75% for CNQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXSE and CNQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer