CXSE vs. CNQQ
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) are both China Equities funds - CXSE tracks the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index while CNQQ tracks the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNQQ.
Performance
CXSE vs. CNQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than CNQQ's 12.03% return.
CXSE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- -8.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
CNQQ
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXSE vs. CNQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 0.56% | -6.51% |
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 12.03% | -5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and CNQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. CNQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
CNQQ
CXSE vs. CNQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXSE | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXSE | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.33 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. CNQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than CNQQ's maximum drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and CNQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -17.82% | -52.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.21% | -1.09% | -45.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.84% | -9.19% | -18.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.45% | — | — |
Volatility
CXSE vs. CNQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 24.37% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 24.37% | +7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 24.37% | +4.32% |
CXSE vs. CNQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CNQQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. CNQQ - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than CNQQ's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 0.23% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.99% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CXSE and CNQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.
CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.23% for CNQQ.
CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while CNQQ tracks Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Rayliant. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.75% for CNQQ.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and CNQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer