CXRN vs. ANGL
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. CXRN is actively managed, while ANGL is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -23.31% vs 8.16% for ANGL. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ANGL.
Performance
CXRN vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -13.42% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.55% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -21.78%
- YTD
- -13.42%
- 6M
- -14.31%
- 1Y
- -23.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
CXRN vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.42% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.04% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and ANGL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
ANGL
CXRN vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXRN | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.37 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 2.02 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | 8.49 | -10.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXRN | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 1.90 | -2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 0.74 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and ANGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.71% | -29.31% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.27% | -4.05% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.16% | -0.30% | -45.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.08% | -3.30% | -26.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.97% | 0.96% | +13.01% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.39% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.37%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.39% | 1.37% | +14.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.75% | 3.46% | +23.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.32% | 4.31% | +32.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 7.63% | +29.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 9.28% | +27.62% |
CXRN vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than ANGL's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.37% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.61% | 3.30% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and ANGL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.39%) compared to ANGL (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -46.71% vs ANGL's -29.31%.
On 1-year performance, ANGL leads with 8.16% vs -23.31% for CXRN. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ANGL has performed better with a 8.16% return vs -23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 2.61% for CXRN.
CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while ANGL is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.35% for ANGL.
ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and ANGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer