CXRN vs. AJAN
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and AJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while AJAN is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -10.34% vs 4.95% for AJAN. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for AJAN.
Performance
CXRN vs. AJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -12.91% return, which is significantly lower than AJAN's 2.10% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 8.98%
- 6M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -12.91%
- 1Y
- -10.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AJAN
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXRN vs. AJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -12.91% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 | 2.10% | 6.12% | -0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and AJAN is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. AJAN — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
AJAN
CXRN vs. AJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXRN | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.44 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 2.21 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 10.77 | -11.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. AJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -53.17%, which is greater than AJAN's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and AJAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.17% | -4.11% | -49.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.96% | -2.24% | -29.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.84% | -0.03% | -45.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.28% | -0.30% | -30.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.49% | 0.46% | +11.03% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. AJAN - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.36% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) at 0.98%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.36% | 0.98% | +14.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.82% | 2.30% | +27.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.85% | 2.48% | +34.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.77% | 3.79% | +33.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.77% | 3.79% | +33.98% |
CXRN vs. AJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. AJAN - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while AJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.47% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and AJAN have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.36%) compared to AJAN (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -53.17% vs AJAN's -4.11%.
On 1-year performance, AJAN leads with 4.95% vs -10.34% for CXRN. On fees, AJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AJAN has performed better with a 4.95% return vs -10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.00% for AJAN.
CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while AJAN is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.79% for AJAN.
AJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and AJAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer