PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXRN vs. AJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXRN vs. AJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -9.43% return, which is significantly lower than AJAN's 2.05% return.


CXRN

1D
-2.14%
1M
-16.28%
YTD
-9.43%
6M
-12.86%
1Y
-19.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AJAN

1D
0.04%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.46%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXRN vs. AJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
-9.43%-25.68%7.40%
AJAN
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026
2.05%6.12%-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CXRN and AJAN is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

-0.14

The correlation between CXRN and AJAN shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXRN vs. AJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXRN
CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AJAN
AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXRN vs. AJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXRNAJANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.55

2.66

-3.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.58

4.16

-4.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.60

-0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

2.82

-3.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.56

14.21

-15.78

CXRN vs. AJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the AJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXRN and AJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXRNAJANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

2.66

-3.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.55

1.75

-2.30

Drawdowns

CXRN vs. AJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, which is greater than AJAN's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and AJAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXRNAJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.71%

-4.11%

-42.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.27%

-2.24%

-23.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.68%

-0.07%

-43.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-0.29%

-29.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.89%

0.44%

+13.45%

Volatility

CXRN vs. AJAN - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) at 0.71%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXRNAJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.34%

0.71%

+14.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.41%

2.04%

+24.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.13%

2.35%

+33.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.78%

3.80%

+32.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.78%

3.80%

+32.98%

CXRN vs. AJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXRN vs. AJAN - Dividend Comparison

CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while AJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CXRN and AJAN have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXRN has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to AJAN (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -46.71% vs AJAN's -4.11%.

On 1-year performance, AJAN leads with 6.25% vs -19.92% for CXRN. On fees, AJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AJAN has performed better with a 6.25% return vs -19.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.

CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.00% for AJAN.

CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while AJAN is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.79% for AJAN.

AJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXRN and AJAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer