CXM vs. LYV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV).

Performance

CXM vs. LYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CXM vs. LYV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CXM Sprinklr, Inc.	-22.88%	-7.93%	-29.82%	47.37%	-48.52%	-9.83%
LYV Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.	7.02%	10.04%	38.35%	34.21%	-41.73%	30.18%

Fundamentals

EPS CXM : $0.09 LYV : $3.83
PE Ratio CXM : 67.71 LYV : 39.79
PEG Ratio CXM : 2.04 LYV : 0.51
PS Ratio CXM : 1.81 LYV : 1.46
Total Revenue (TTM) CXM : $857.20M LYV : $24.57B
Gross Profit (TTM) CXM : $577.78M LYV : $11.35B
EBITDA (TTM) CXM : $63.52M LYV : $1.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXM achieves a -22.88% return, which is significantly lower than LYV's 7.02% return.

CXM

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: -22.88%
• 6M: -22.28%
• 1Y: -28.14%
• 3Y*: -22.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LYV

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: -5.94%
• YTD: 7.02%
• 6M: -6.66%
• 1Y: 16.79%
• 3Y*: 29.64%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 21.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CXM vs. LYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXM

CXM Risk / Return Rank: 14
CXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CXM Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CXM Martin Ratio Rank: 12

LYV

LYV Risk / Return Rank: 58
LYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
LYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
LYV Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LYV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXM vs. LYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXM	LYV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	0.52	-1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	0.96	-1.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.12	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	0.79	-1.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	1.89	-3.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXM vs. LYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXM Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the LYV Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXM and LYV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXM	LYV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72	0.52	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.39	0.30	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between CXM and LYV is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CXM vs. LYV - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXM nor LYV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CXM vs. LYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXM drawdown since its inception was -78.26%, smaller than the maximum LYV drawdown of -89.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXM and LYV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXM	LYV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.26%	-89.94%	+11.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.17%	-27.84%	-16.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.01%	-12.38%	-62.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.72%	-27.17%	-26.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.71%	11.66%	+9.05%

Volatility

CXM vs. LYV - Volatility Comparison

Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) have volatilities of 11.51% and 11.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXM	LYV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.51%	11.58%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.62%	24.44%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.48%	32.62%	+6.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.18%	35.39%	+16.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.18%	38.21%	+13.97%

Financials

CXM vs. LYV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sprinklr, Inc. and Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CXM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sprinklr, Inc. reported a gross profit of 144.83M and revenue of 220.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.7%.

LYV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.23B and revenue of 8.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.1%.

CXM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sprinklr, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.41M and revenue of 220.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

LYV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 792.45M and revenue of 8.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.

CXM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sprinklr, Inc. reported a net income of 8.95M and revenue of 220.59M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

LYV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of 431.46M and revenue of 8.50B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.