CXM vs. BBAI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CXM (Sprinklr, Inc.) and BBAI (BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CXM in Software - Application, BBAI in Information Technology Services. Over the past 3 years, CXM returned -25.50%/yr vs 33.72%/yr for BBAI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CXM vs. BBAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXM achieves a -29.95% return, which is significantly lower than BBAI's -10.56% return.

CXM

• 1D: -3.02%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: -29.95%
• 6M: -29.86%
• 1Y: -36.26%
• 3Y*: -25.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBAI

• 1D: -5.48%
• 1M: 15.83%
• YTD: -10.56%
• 6M: -20.82%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 33.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXM vs. BBAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CXM Sprinklr, Inc.	-29.95%	-7.93%	-29.82%	47.37%	-48.52%	8.48%
BBAI BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.	-10.56%	21.35%	107.94%	217.65%	-88.10%	-35.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CXM and BBAI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021	0.27

The correlation between CXM and BBAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CXM : $1.33B BBAI : $22.85B
EPS CXM : $0.11 BBAI : -$0.13
PS Ratio CXM : 1.60 BBAI : 86.16
PB Ratio CXM : 2.71 BBAI : 28.91
Total Revenue (TTM) CXM : $871.18M BBAI : $127.35M
Gross Profit (TTM) CXM : $577.95M BBAI : $32.81M
EBITDA (TTM) CXM : $64.44M BBAI : -$230.18M

Return for Risk

CXM vs. BBAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXM

CXM Risk / Return Rank: 9
CXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CXM Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CXM Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BBAI

BBAI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BBAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BBAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BBAI Omega Ratio Rank: 53
BBAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BBAI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXM vs. BBAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXM	BBAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	0.28	-1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.23	1.25	-2.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.13	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	0.42	-1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	0.72	-2.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXM vs. BBAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXM Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the BBAI Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXM and BBAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXM	BBAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.93	0.28	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	-0.07	-0.34

Drawdowns

CXM vs. BBAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXM drawdown since its inception was -79.84%, smaller than the maximum BBAI drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXM and BBAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXM	BBAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.84%	-95.01%	+15.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.24%	-65.88%	+17.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-71.07%	-75.56%	+4.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.30%	-61.94%	-15.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.57%	-70.89%	+16.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.05%	38.34%	-11.29%

Volatility

CXM vs. BBAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) is 14.64%, while BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) has a volatility of 21.79%. This indicates that CXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXM	BBAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.64%	21.79%	-7.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.75%	57.08%	-26.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.52%	97.66%	-58.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.06%	175.05%	-122.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.06%	175.05%	-122.99%

Dividends

CXM vs. BBAI - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXM nor BBAI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CXM and BBAI in my portfolio?

CXM and BBAI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CXM or BBAI?

BBAI has higher volatility (21.79%) compared to CXM (14.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXM dropped -79.84% vs BBAI's -95.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.