CXM vs. DTCR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR).

DTCR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020.

Performance

CXM vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CXM vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CXM Sprinklr, Inc.	-22.88%	-7.93%	-29.82%	47.37%	-48.52%	-9.83%
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	13.55%	28.99%	14.92%	18.93%	-30.89%	9.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXM achieves a -22.88% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 13.55% return.

CXM

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: -22.88%
• 6M: -22.28%
• 1Y: -28.14%
• 3Y*: -22.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DTCR

• 1D: 3.90%
• 1M: -6.26%
• YTD: 13.55%
• 6M: 17.74%
• 1Y: 49.09%
• 3Y*: 23.89%
• 5Y*: 10.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CXM vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXM

CXM Risk / Return Rank: 14
CXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CXM Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CXM Martin Ratio Rank: 12

DTCR

DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 92
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXM vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXM	DTCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	2.12	-2.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	2.77	-3.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.37	-0.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	3.74	-4.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	11.13	-12.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXM vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXM Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXM and DTCR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXM	DTCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72	2.12	-2.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.39	0.51	-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between CXM and DTCR is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CXM vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

CXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CXM Sprinklr, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	0.97%	1.10%	1.72%	1.18%	2.57%	1.27%	0.30%

Drawdowns

CXM vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXM drawdown since its inception was -78.26%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXM and DTCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXM	DTCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.26%	-38.98%	-39.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.17%	-13.07%	-31.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.01%	-8.58%	-66.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.72%	-12.73%	-40.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.71%	4.39%	+16.32%

Volatility

CXM vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) has a higher volatility of 11.51% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 8.15%. This indicates that CXM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXM	DTCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.51%	8.15%	+3.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.62%	17.43%	+7.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.48%	23.24%	+16.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.18%	21.58%	+30.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.18%	21.83%	+30.35%