CXM vs. DTCR
CXM (Sprinklr, Inc.) is a stock, while DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) is REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Over the past 5 years, CXM returned -19.94%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for DTCR. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CXM vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXM achieves a -18.25% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 30.53% return.
CXM
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- 17.56%
- 6M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- -18.25%
- 1Y
- -25.87%
- 3Y*
- -23.53%
- 5Y*
- -19.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.03%
DTCR
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- YTD
- 30.53%
- 1Y
- 47.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.47M | $17.98M | $19.54M | |
| $22.41M | $38.68M | $44.72M |
CXM vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXM Sprinklr, Inc. | -18.25% | -7.93% | -29.82% | 47.37% | -48.52% | 8.70% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 30.53% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXM and DTCR is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CXM and DTCR shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXM vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank
CXM
DTCR
CXM vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXM | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.30 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 2.55 | -3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 8.11 | -9.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXM vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXM drawdown since its inception was -79.84%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXM and DTCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXM | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.84% | -38.98% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.40% | -17.88% | -28.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.07% | -24.96% | -46.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.81% | -38.98% | -36.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.51% | -15.15% | -58.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.23% | -12.26% | -42.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.46% | 5.62% | +23.84% |
Volatility
CXM vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison
Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 8.80%. This indicates that CXM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXM | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.17% | 8.80% | +3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.03% | 19.77% | +11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.30% | 24.75% | +14.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.13% | 22.50% | +27.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.44% | 22.25% | +30.19% |
Dividends
CXM vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison
CXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXM Sprinklr, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.90% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXM and DTCR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXM has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to DTCR (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXM dropped -79.84% vs DTCR's -38.98%.
DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXM and DTCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer