CXM vs. DTCR
CXM (Sprinklr, Inc.) is a stock, while DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) is REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Over the past 3 years, CXM returned -25.50%/yr vs 36.32%/yr for DTCR. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CXM vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXM achieves a -29.95% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 52.56% return.
CXM
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- -29.95%
- 6M
- -29.86%
- 1Y
- -36.26%
- 3Y*
- -25.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTCR
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- 52.56%
- 6M
- 54.49%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 36.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- —
CXM vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXM Sprinklr, Inc. | -29.95% | -7.93% | -29.82% | 47.37% | -48.52% | -9.83% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 52.56% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 9.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXM and DTCR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CXM and DTCR has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXM vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank
CXM
DTCR
CXM vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXM | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | 3.90 | -4.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | 4.71 | -5.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.61 | -0.76 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 6.61 | -7.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 20.78 | -22.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXM | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | 3.90 | -4.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.76 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
CXM vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXM drawdown since its inception was -79.84%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXM and DTCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXM | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.84% | -38.98% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.24% | -12.89% | -35.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.07% | -24.96% | -46.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.30% | -0.74% | -76.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.57% | -12.37% | -42.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.05% | 4.09% | +22.96% |
Volatility
CXM vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison
Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) has a higher volatility of 14.64% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 7.16%. This indicates that CXM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXM | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.64% | 7.16% | +7.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.75% | 16.92% | +13.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.52% | 21.84% | +17.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.06% | 21.83% | +30.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.06% | 21.90% | +30.16% |
Dividends
CXM vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison
CXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXM Sprinklr, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.72% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXM and DTCR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXM has higher volatility (14.64%) compared to DTCR (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXM dropped -79.84% vs DTCR's -38.98%.
DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXM and DTCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer