PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYV vs. RACE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYV vs. RACE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYV achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly higher than RACE's -4.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LYV has underperformed RACE with an annualized return of 21.00%, while RACE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.26% annualized return.


LYV

1D
-2.02%
1M
4.23%
YTD
15.26%
6M
20.76%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
21.00%

RACE

1D
-2.66%
1M
1.62%
YTD
-4.64%
6M
-10.52%
1Y
-25.93%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
24.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYV vs. RACE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
15.26%10.04%38.35%34.21%-41.73%62.89%2.81%45.12%15.69%60.04%
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
-4.64%-11.65%26.34%59.12%-16.68%13.32%39.71%67.87%-4.47%81.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LYV and RACE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYV:

$38.17B

RACE:

$61.07B

EPS

LYV:

$0.36

RACE:

$8.98

PE Ratio

LYV:

459.87

RACE:

38.34

PEG Ratio

LYV:

5.87

RACE:

1.98

PS Ratio

LYV:

1.50

RACE:

8.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYV:

$25.61B

RACE:

$7.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYV:

$10.31B

RACE:

$3.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYV:

$1.55B

RACE:

$3.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYV vs. RACE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYV
LYV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RACE
RACE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RACE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RACE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RACE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RACE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RACE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYV vs. RACE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYVRACEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.88

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

-0.66

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

-1.06

+2.76

LYV vs. RACE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYV Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the RACE Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYV and RACE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYVRACEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

-0.75

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.38

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.66

-0.35

Drawdowns

LYV vs. RACE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYV drawdown since its inception was -89.94%, which is greater than RACE's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYV and RACE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYVRACEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.94%

-43.61%

-46.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.84%

-39.22%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-39.22%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.16%

-39.22%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.23%

-39.22%

-22.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-31.92%

+26.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.00%

-10.97%

-16.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.91%

24.52%

-12.61%

Volatility

LYV vs. RACE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) is 8.65%, while Ferrari N.V. (RACE) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that LYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RACE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYVRACEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

11.94%

-3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

23.86%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.89%

34.63%

-3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.16%

29.41%

+5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.32%

29.50%

+8.82%

Dividends

LYV vs. RACE - Dividend Comparison

LYV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RACE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
2.47%1.85%0.61%0.59%0.69%0.40%0.54%0.70%0.88%0.61%0.79%

Financials

LYV vs. RACE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ferrari N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
3.79B
1.86B
(LYV) Total Revenue
(RACE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LYV vs. RACE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ferrari N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
51.8%
Portfolio components
LYV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RACE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported a gross profit of 961.64M and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

LYV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of -370.52M and revenue of 3.79B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.8%.

RACE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported an operating income of 554.10M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

LYV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of -389.10M and revenue of 3.79B, resulting in a net margin of -10.3%.

RACE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported a net income of 414.57M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYV and RACE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RACE has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to LYV (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYV dropped -89.94% vs RACE's -43.61%.

LYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYV and RACE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer