PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXDO vs. NBIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CXDO vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXDO achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 228.83% return.


CXDO

1D
4.42%
1M
-23.83%
YTD
13.14%
6M
10.91%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
59.03%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*
18.99%

NBIS

1D
-2.95%
1M
28.16%
YTD
228.83%
6M
205.73%
1Y
479.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXDO vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.
13.14%23.71%-6.94%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
228.83%202.18%46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CXDO and NBIS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.24

The correlation between CXDO and NBIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CXDO:

$239.25M

NBIS:

$85.04B

EPS

CXDO:

$0.14

NBIS:

$3.17

PE Ratio

CXDO:

52.09

NBIS:

86.70

PEG Ratio

CXDO:

0.39

NBIS:

29.79

PS Ratio

CXDO:

3.20

NBIS:

82.60

PB Ratio

CXDO:

3.29

NBIS:

11.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

CXDO:

$72.82M

NBIS:

$877.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CXDO:

$60.36M

NBIS:

$420.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

CXDO:

$6.49M

NBIS:

-$52.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXDO vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXDO
CXDO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CXDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXDO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CXDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXDO vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXDONBISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.47

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

10.64

-9.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.02

24.32

-21.30

CXDO vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXDO Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXDO and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXDO vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXDO drawdown since its inception was -88.55%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXDO and NBIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXDONBISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.55%

-58.27%

-30.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.86%

-45.47%

+10.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.50%

-3.99%

-30.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.58%

-18.69%

-21.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.55%

19.85%

-7.30%

Volatility

CXDO vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) have volatilities of 25.88% and 27.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXDONBISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.88%

27.11%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.48%

71.03%

-25.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.12%

104.65%

-44.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.02%

109.87%

-39.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.65%

109.87%

-31.22%

Dividends

CXDO vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXDO nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%1.05%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CXDO vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crexendo, Inc. and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
20.71M
399.00M
(CXDO) Total Revenue
(NBIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CXDO and NBIS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (27.11%) compared to CXDO (25.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXDO dropped -88.55% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXDO and NBIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer