PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWVX vs. QQQP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWVX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWVX achieves a -45.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQP's 15.23% return.


CWVX

1D
-5.82%
1M
-30.81%
6M
-65.40%
YTD
-45.27%
1Y
-83.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-88.55%

QQQP

1D
1.56%
1M
-7.63%
6M
13.12%
YTD
15.23%
1Y
37.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.79M$16.48M$36.04M
$865.31K$566.51K$438.05K

CWVX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CWVX
Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF
-45.27%-81.40%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
15.23%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CWVX and QQQP is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.48

The correlation between CWVX and QQQP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWVX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CWVX
CWVX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CWVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWVX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CWVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWVX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CWVX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWVXQQQPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.16

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

1.27

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

4.02

-5.21

CWVX vs. QQQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the QQQP Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWVX and QQQP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWVX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWVX drawdown since its inception was -93.85%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWVX and QQQP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWVXQQQPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.85%

-42.50%

-51.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.85%

-25.35%

-68.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.74%

-15.47%

-76.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.33%

-7.46%

-59.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.12%

8.01%

+64.11%

Volatility

CWVX vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) has a higher volatility of 62.07% compared to Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) at 14.67%. This indicates that CWVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWVXQQQPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

62.07%

14.67%

+47.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

138.54%

30.88%

+107.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

194.23%

37.67%

+156.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

192.08%

44.67%

+147.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

192.08%

44.67%

+147.41%

CWVX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CWVX and QQQP have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

CWVX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

CWVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
CWVX
Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF
3.83%2.10%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWVX and QQQP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWVX has higher volatility (62.07%) compared to QQQP (14.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWVX dropped -93.85% vs QQQP's -42.50%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 37.33% vs -83.03% for CWVX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 14.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 37.33% return vs -83.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CWVX and QQQP have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

CWVX has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWVX and QQQP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer