CWVX vs. RGTU

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CWVX (Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

CWVX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWVX achieves a 24.14% return, which is significantly higher than RGTU's -55.83% return.

CWVX

• 1D: -9.44%
• 1M: -14.70%
• YTD: 24.14%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RGTU

• 1D: -16.33%
• 1M: -52.54%
• YTD: -55.83%
• 6M: -64.36%
• 1Y: -20.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWVX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	24.14%	-81.40%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-55.83%	45.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CWVX and RGTU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

CWVX vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWVX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 17
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 27
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWVX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWVX	RGTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.21	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.27	—

Drawdowns

CWVX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWVX drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWVX and RGTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWVX	RGTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.29%	-96.96%	+7.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-96.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.27%	-95.06%	+13.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.07%	-63.73%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	73.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CWVX	RGTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	64.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	141.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	188.84%	219.15%	-30.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	188.84%	219.15%	-30.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	188.84%	219.15%	-30.31%

CWVX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CWVX and RGTU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

CWVX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison

CWVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than RGTU's 46.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	1.69%	2.10%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	46.70%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWVX and RGTU in my portfolio?

CWVX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CWVX or RGTU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CWVX or RGTU?

CWVX and RGTU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CWVX or RGTU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 46.70%, compared with 1.69% for CWVX.