CWVX vs. RGTU
CWVX (Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CWVX returned -87.90% vs -60.15% for RGTU. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
CWVX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWVX achieves a -31.23% return, which is significantly higher than RGTU's -74.25% return.
CWVX
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -51.73%
- 6M
- -54.96%
- YTD
- -31.23%
- 1Y
- -87.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU
- 1D
- -11.09%
- 1M
- -57.62%
- 6M
- -80.47%
- YTD
- -74.25%
- 1Y
- -60.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWVX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | -31.23% | -81.40% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -74.25% | 45.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWVX and RGTU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWVX vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank
CWVX
RGTU
CWVX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWVX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.11 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.62 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | -0.78 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWVX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWVX drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -97.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWVX and RGTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWVX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -97.12% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.62% | -97.12% | +7.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.62% | -97.12% | +7.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.22% | -65.44% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.85% | 76.95% | -7.10% |
Volatility
CWVX vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) has a higher volatility of 51.52% compared to Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) at 46.26%. This indicates that CWVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWVX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 51.52% | 46.26% | +5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.06% | 140.45% | -8.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.83% | 217.99% | -30.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.87% | 215.87% | -28.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.87% | 215.87% | -28.00% |
CWVX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CWVX and RGTU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
CWVX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison
CWVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than RGTU's 80.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 3.05% | 2.10% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 80.10% | 20.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWVX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWVX has higher volatility (51.52%) compared to RGTU (46.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWVX dropped -89.62% vs RGTU's -97.12%.
On 1-year performance, RGTU leads with -60.15% vs -87.90% for CWVX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, RGTU has been the lower-risk option at 46.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RGTU has performed better with a -60.15% return vs -87.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWVX and RGTU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 80.10%, compared with 3.05% for CWVX.
RGTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWVX and RGTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer