PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YORW vs. GWRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

YORW vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The York Water Company (YORW) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YORW achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly higher than GWRS's -11.73% return. Over the past 10 years, YORW has outperformed GWRS with an annualized return of 2.47%, while GWRS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.15% annualized return.


YORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.94%
6M
-6.45%
YTD
-1.84%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
-6.70%
5Y*
-6.85%
10Y*
2.47%
ALL TIME*
9.31%

GWRS

1D
1.82%
1M
1.60%
6M
-13.91%
YTD
-11.73%
1Y
-21.45%
3Y*
-13.96%
5Y*
-13.91%
10Y*
2.15%
ALL TIME*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$594.44K$608.27K$853.66K
$3.72M$5.43M$4.49M

YORW vs. GWRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YORW
The York Water Company
-1.84%0.08%-13.23%-12.40%-7.93%8.61%2.67%46.40%-3.34%-9.61%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
-11.73%-24.33%-9.94%0.95%-20.68%20.65%12.34%33.21%11.84%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between YORW and GWRS is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YORW:

$499.41M

GWRS:

$209.69M

EPS

YORW:

$2.21

GWRS:

$0.07

PE Ratio

YORW:

13.94

GWRS:

101.26

PEG Ratio

YORW:

5.75

GWRS:

66.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

YORW:

-$18.46M

GWRS:

$56.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

YORW:

-$40.05M

GWRS:

$16.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

YORW:

$31.13M

GWRS:

$19.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YORW vs. GWRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YORW
YORW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
YORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
YORW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
YORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
YORW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GWRS
GWRS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GWRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWRS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GWRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWRS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YORW vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The York Water Company (YORW) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YORWGWRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.91

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

-0.56

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

-0.91

+1.51

YORW vs. GWRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YORW Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the GWRS Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YORW and GWRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YORW vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YORW drawdown since its inception was -46.68%, smaller than the maximum GWRS drawdown of -63.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YORW and GWRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YORWGWRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.68%

-63.38%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.93%

-38.17%

+24.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.79%

-48.36%

+21.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.62%

-63.38%

+23.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.62%

-63.38%

+23.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.37%

-59.49%

+24.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-22.53%

+9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.86%

23.71%

-16.85%

Volatility

YORW vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The York Water Company (YORW) is 7.02%, while Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that YORW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YORWGWRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

8.33%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

26.88%

-12.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.47%

33.88%

-13.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.93%

32.27%

-9.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.20%

33.51%

-4.31%

Dividends

YORW vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison

YORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than GWRS's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
4.17%3.60%2.62%2.28%2.22%1.71%2.01%2.18%2.81%2.94%1.90%0.00%
YORW
The York Water Company
2.93%2.78%2.60%2.12%1.75%1.52%1.56%1.52%2.10%1.91%1.64%2.42%

Financials

YORW vs. GWRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The York Water Company and Global Water Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


YORW and GWRS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWRS has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to YORW (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YORW dropped -46.68% vs GWRS's -63.38%.

YORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YORW and GWRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer