PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWII vs. QQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWII vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 37.23% return, which is significantly higher than QQA's 14.57% return.


CWII

1D
-5.26%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
37.23%
6M
17.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQA

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.03%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.20%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWII vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
37.23%-42.16%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
14.57%0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CWII and QQA is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWII vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWII

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWII vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CWII vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIIQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

1.18

-1.55

Drawdowns

CWII vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than QQA's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and QQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIIQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.46%

-19.73%

-28.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.63%

-0.10%

-20.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-2.44%

-28.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

Volatility

CWII vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIIQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.61%

12.59%

+76.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.61%

18.27%

+70.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.61%

18.27%

+70.34%

CWII vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWII vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than QQA's 9.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
20.73%6.09%0.00%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.29%9.78%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWII and QQA have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 9.29% for QQA.

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.29% for QQA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWII and QQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer