CWI vs. IDEV
CWI (State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CWI tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index while IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWI returned 9.44%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for IDEV. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CWI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.
Performance
CWI vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly higher than IDEV's 11.37% return.
CWI
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 13.37%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.43%
IDEV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 25.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.74M | $9.97M | $9.68M | |
| $135.88M | $124.12M | $125.37M |
CWI vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 13.37% | 32.75% | 6.27% | 15.74% | -15.39% | 8.81% | 9.83% | 21.92% | -13.83% | 17.55% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 11.37% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -14.10% | 17.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWI and IDEV is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between CWI and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWI vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWI
IDEV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
CWI
IDEV
Technology
CWI
IDEV
Industrials
CWI
IDEV
Consumer Cyclical
CWI
IDEV
Healthcare
CWI
IDEV
Energy
CWI
IDEV
Basic Materials
CWI
IDEV
Communication Services
CWI
IDEV
Consumer Defensive
CWI
IDEV
Utilities
CWI
IDEV
Real Estate
CWI
IDEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWI vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank
CWI
IDEV
CWI vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWI | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.24 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 8.85 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWI vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than IDEV's maximum drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and IDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWI | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -34.77% | -26.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -11.20% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | -13.41% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.80% | -29.15% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -0.72% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.77% | -6.47% | -6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.83% | +0.29% |
Volatility
CWI vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.44%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWI | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 4.44% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.27% | 13.19% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.17% | 15.21% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 16.36% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.25% | -0.21% |
CWI vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWI vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison
CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than IDEV's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.72% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.18% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CWI and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CWI has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to IDEV (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs IDEV's -34.77%.
On 5-year performance, CWI leads with 9.44% vs 9.25% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CWI has performed better with a 9.44% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.
IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.72% for CWI.
CWI tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.05% for IDEV.
CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWI and IDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer