PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWI vs. HAWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWI vs. HAWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly lower than HAWX's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CWI has underperformed HAWX with an annualized return of 10.82%, while HAWX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.


CWI

1D
0.29%
1M
4.38%
YTD
16.41%
6M
17.00%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
10.82%

HAWX

1D
0.64%
1M
5.80%
YTD
19.66%
6M
20.07%
1Y
40.65%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWI vs. HAWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
16.41%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%26.89%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
19.66%26.24%14.88%17.05%-8.59%13.40%6.92%22.75%-9.77%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CWI and HAWX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.82

The correlation between CWI and HAWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CWI vs. HAWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CWI
HAWX

Financial Services

23.8%
23.2%

Technology

21.6%
22.5%

Industrials

14.4%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
7.5%

Healthcare

6.8%
6.8%

Basic Materials

6.6%
6.9%

Energy

5.1%
4.8%

Communication Services

5.0%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.8%

Utilities

2.8%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.4%

Financial Services

CWI
23.8%
HAWX
23.2%

Technology

CWI
21.6%
HAWX
22.5%

Industrials

CWI
14.4%
HAWX
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CWI
8.0%
HAWX
7.5%

Healthcare

CWI
6.8%
HAWX
6.8%

Basic Materials

CWI
6.6%
HAWX
6.9%

Energy

CWI
5.1%
HAWX
4.8%

Communication Services

CWI
5.0%
HAWX
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

CWI
5.0%
HAWX
4.8%

Utilities

CWI
2.8%
HAWX
3.0%

Real Estate

CWI
1.2%
HAWX
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWI vs. HAWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWI vs. HAWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWIHAWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.56

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

4.35

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

18.01

-6.13

CWI vs. HAWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWI Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HAWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWI and HAWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWI vs. HAWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than HAWX's maximum drawdown of -30.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and HAWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIHAWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-30.63%

-30.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-9.39%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-13.30%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-17.47%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-30.63%

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-4.27%

-8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.26%

+0.72%

Volatility

CWI vs. HAWX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) at 5.92%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIHAWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

5.92%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

12.26%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

13.98%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

13.54%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

15.24%

+1.93%

CWI vs. HAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HAWX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWI vs. HAWX - Dividend Comparison

CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than HAWX's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.64%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.34%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CWI and HAWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CWI has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to HAWX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs HAWX's -30.63%.

On 10-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.83% vs 10.82% for CWI. On fees, CWI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HAWX has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CWI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HAWX.

CWI has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.34% for HAWX.

CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.35% for HAWX.

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWI and HAWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer