CWI vs. FID
CWI (SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CWI tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWI returned 8.77%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
CWI vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.
CWI
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
CWI vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 13.91% | 32.75% | 6.27% | 15.74% | -15.39% | 8.81% | 9.83% | 21.92% | -12.36% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWI and FID is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CWI and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWI vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWI
FID
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
CWI
FID
Technology
CWI
FID
Industrials
CWI
FID
Consumer Cyclical
CWI
FID
Healthcare
CWI
FID
Energy
CWI
FID
Basic Materials
CWI
FID
Communication Services
CWI
FID
Consumer Defensive
CWI
FID
Utilities
CWI
FID
Real Estate
CWI
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWI vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
CWI
FID
CWI vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.62 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 9.14 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.30 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.46 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.39 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
CWI vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -39.79% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -8.93% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | -10.97% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.45% | -29.13% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -1.11% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.86% | -8.47% | -4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.55% | +0.40% |
Volatility
CWI vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 3.00% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 8.12% | +4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 10.16% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 17.04% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 18.96% | -1.83% |
CWI vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWI vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.70% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWI and FID have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWI has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, CWI leads with 8.77% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, CWI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CWI has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.70% for CWI.
CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWI and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer