PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWFIX vs. BCAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWFIX vs. BCAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWFIX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than BCAAX's 0.33% return.


CWFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.04%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
4.01%

BCAAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWFIX vs. BCAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.50%6.99%5.78%7.80%-3.17%0.59%
BCAAX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund
0.33%5.27%8.92%11.47%-9.47%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CWFIX and BCAAX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.72

The correlation between CWFIX and BCAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWFIX vs. BCAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWFIX
CWFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CWFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CWFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BCAAX
BCAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BCAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWFIX vs. BCAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWFIXBCAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.08

1.35

+0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

1.82

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.36

7.84

+19.52

CWFIX vs. BCAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWFIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the BCAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWFIX and BCAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWFIXBCAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

1.58

+2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.84

+0.29

Drawdowns

CWFIX vs. BCAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWFIX drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum BCAAX drawdown of -13.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWFIX and BCAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWFIXBCAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-13.21%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

-2.48%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.37%

-3.71%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-3.01%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.57%

-0.36%

Volatility

CWFIX vs. BCAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) is 0.43%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) has a volatility of 0.82%. This indicates that CWFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWFIXBCAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

0.82%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.19%

2.22%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49%

2.86%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

4.04%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.09%

4.04%

-0.95%

CWFIX vs. BCAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWFIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BCAAX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWFIX vs. BCAAX - Dividend Comparison

CWFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than BCAAX's 5.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCAAX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund
5.61%6.27%6.87%4.68%4.99%3.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
5.15%5.17%5.09%4.41%3.17%2.79%3.38%3.60%3.24%2.82%3.79%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWFIX and BCAAX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCAAX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to CWFIX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWFIX dropped -12.41% vs BCAAX's -13.21%.

CWFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWFIX and BCAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer