CWEB vs. CHAU
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%) while CHAU tracks the CSI 300 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -46.97%/yr vs -8.45%/yr for CHAU. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for CHAU.
Performance
CWEB vs. CHAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -55.28% return, which is significantly lower than CHAU's 20.36% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- -25.71%
- YTD
- -55.28%
- 6M
- -56.43%
- 1Y
- -53.75%
- 3Y*
- -18.20%
- 5Y*
- -46.97%
- 10Y*
- —
CHAU
- 1D
- 4.68%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 6M
- 20.62%
- 1Y
- 70.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- -8.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
CWEB vs. CHAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -55.28% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 20.36% | 47.73% | 6.61% | -28.25% | -49.17% | -2.84% | 71.95% | 70.01% | -51.03% | 74.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and CHAU is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.63 |
The correlation between CWEB and CHAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWEB vs. CHAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
CHAU
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
CWEB
CHAU
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
CHAU
Healthcare
CWEB
CHAU
Real Estate
CWEB
CHAU
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
CHAU
Technology
CWEB
CHAU
Financial Services
CWEB
CHAU
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
CHAU
Energy
CWEB
-
CHAU
Industrials
CWEB
-
CHAU
Utilities
CWEB
-
CHAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. CHAU — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
CHAU
CWEB vs. CHAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.33 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 4.66 | -5.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 13.04 | -14.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. CHAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than CHAU's maximum drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and CHAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -79.21% | -18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | -15.27% | -54.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | -59.88% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.85% | -72.59% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.18% | -51.43% | -46.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.67% | -58.85% | -6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.36% | 5.45% | +29.91% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. CHAU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) at 14.69%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.01% | 14.69% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.01% | 25.91% | +15.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.08% | 35.56% | +18.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.56% | 47.33% | +47.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.53% | 47.22% | +33.31% |
CWEB vs. CHAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAU's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. CHAU - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than CHAU's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 1.80% | 1.97% | 2.25% | 3.97% | 0.77% | 1.73% | 0.09% | 0.58% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 8.12% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and CHAU have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (16.01%) compared to CHAU (14.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs CHAU's -79.21%.
On 5-year performance, CHAU leads with -8.45% vs -46.97% for CWEB. On fees, CHAU is cheaper at 1.21% per year. On volatility, CHAU has been the lower-risk option at 14.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CHAU has performed better with a -8.45% return vs -46.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHAU is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 1.80% for CHAU.
CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 1.21% for CHAU.
CHAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and CHAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer