CWD vs. QQQ
CWD (CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, CWD returned -77.18%/yr vs 22.29%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CWD vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWD achieves a -61.48% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return.
CWD
- 1D
- -6.79%
- 1M
- -61.17%
- 6M
- -60.85%
- YTD
- -61.48%
- 1Y
- -83.42%
- 3Y*
- -77.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -79.43%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $134.67K | $20.18M | $6.95M | |
| $30.32B | $28.40B | $31.45B |
CWD vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CWD CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock | -61.48% | -91.13% | -45.81% | -66.05% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 12.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 25.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWD and QQQ is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2023 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWD vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CWD
QQQ
CWD vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock (CWD) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.88 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 6.00 | -7.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWD vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWD drawdown since its inception was -99.69%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWD and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.69% | -82.97% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.76% | -11.96% | -82.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.79% | -22.77% | -76.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.69% | -7.69% | -92.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.69% | -32.62% | -58.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 77.42% | 3.74% | +73.68% |
Volatility
CWD vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock (CWD) has a higher volatility of 77.86% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that CWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 77.86% | 6.87% | +70.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.37% | 16.08% | +85.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 390.88% | 19.38% | +371.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 233.47% | 22.90% | +210.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 233.47% | 22.50% | +210.97% |
Dividends
CWD vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWD CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWD and QQQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWD has higher volatility (77.86%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWD dropped -99.69% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWD and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer