PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWD vs. LINK-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CWD vs. LINK-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock (CWD) and Chainlink (LINK-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWD achieves a -61.48% return, which is significantly lower than LINK-USD's -33.78% return.


CWD

1D
-6.79%
1M
-61.17%
6M
-60.85%
YTD
-61.48%
1Y
-83.42%
3Y*
-77.18%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-79.43%

LINK-USD

1D
-1.18%
1M
4.22%
6M
-19.17%
YTD
-33.78%
1Y
-49.79%
3Y*
3.17%
5Y*
-19.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
56.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$134.67K$20.18M$6.95M

LINK-USD

Chainlink
$1.81B$1.83B$3.17B

CWD vs. LINK-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CWD
CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock
-61.48%-91.13%-45.81%-66.05%
LINK-USD
Chainlink
-33.78%-39.00%33.73%124.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CWD and LINK-USD is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2023

0.12

The correlation between CWD and LINK-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWD vs. LINK-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CWD
CWD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

LINK-USD
LINK-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LINK-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINK-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINK-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LINK-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINK-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CWD vs. LINK-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock (CWD) and Chainlink (LINK-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWDLINK-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.93

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.68

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-0.91

-0.17

CWD vs. LINK-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWD Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the LINK-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWD and LINK-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWD vs. LINK-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWD drawdown since its inception was -99.69%, which is greater than LINK-USD's maximum drawdown of -90.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWD and LINK-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWDLINK-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.69%

-90.19%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.76%

-73.15%

-21.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.79%

-75.42%

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.69%

-84.59%

-15.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.69%

-60.79%

-29.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

77.42%

34.96%

+42.46%

Volatility

CWD vs. LINK-USD - Volatility Comparison

CaliberCos Inc. Class A Common Stock (CWD) has a higher volatility of 77.86% compared to Chainlink (LINK-USD) at 12.98%. This indicates that CWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LINK-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWDLINK-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

77.86%

12.98%

+64.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.37%

43.21%

+58.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

390.88%

62.90%

+327.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

233.47%

73.88%

+159.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

233.47%

100.25%

+133.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWD and LINK-USD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWD has higher volatility (77.86%) compared to LINK-USD (12.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWD dropped -99.69% vs LINK-USD's -90.19%.

CWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWD and LINK-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer